In such case , the producer lead lower the price of his product which would ultimately go out in the bug out of the quantity demanded (Hamilton and Suslow , 2000 Brue and Mcconnell 2005 ) Lowering the price would be the beneficial as well as prudent decisiveness for the producer because of the fact that the quantity demand of the product process more than the finish to which the prices are lower (Nordhaus and Samuelson , 2004 ) Thus , lessen the price would topic in capturing the competitor s customers , reducing his market share . Thus , even if the aggregate demand in the market would continue same , yet the individual demand of the producer will rise with the lowering of cost . This direction , though his shekels margin would diminish , but the join on in sales volume would outweigh that effect , resulting in the winnings increase in pelfLet s take example of a vi deo recording of Brand `A . The cost per unit was hundred . At point To he had price of one hundred fifty per implant and had demand of 60 sets . At point T1 he lowered the price to 140 per sets , the result was the increase in sales to 820 unitsInitial profit (To : 50 X 600 units 3000New Profit (T1 : 30 X 150 units 4500Thus this shows that although the profit per unit (profit margin declined , but the growth in sales volume outweighed that effect resulting in increase of 2800 net profit . Lets look it graphically To sum up , the products having price...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment