'Ponzi scheme and Madoff Fraud\r'

'Ponzi dodging is a deceitful chthoniantaking whereby the investors are duped into a patently profitable deal. The clients are asked to â€Å"invest” their funds in a venture to puddle huge interest rates. This normally industrial plant through the payment of the earlier investors’ interests and principals by using the later investors’ principal amount. This mislabeled activity got its name after Charles Ponzi of England (1920s). Bernard L. Madoff and Ponzi escape Bernard Madoff, 70, is the former chairman of Nasdaq Stock Market. He held the position till December 2008 when he was arrested over alleged possibly the largest actor ever in history.He is the fo beneath of Bernard L. Madoff investiture Securities, which undertakes market-making, and acting as middleman in buying and selling of securities, but is since under receivership after a court piece was obtained to place an injunction on its trading operations by the Security trade Commission. (Mi ke, 2008) It was revealed that Madoff had a separate and privateive investment tree branch of his stiff which was running on a separate floor of their premises. The mansion’s monetary statements were kept â€Å"under ignition lock and key” and Madoff was â€Å"cryptic” approximately the firm’s investment arm, according to around top level management employees of the firm.This secret investment arm is the one under investigation due to believe that it is where the Ponzi scheme was perpetrated. (Mike, 2008) Madoff was very smart in playacting the Ponzi scheme. He filed false returns with the Securities Exchange Commission, and fabricated gains claiming that its investments together with accounting and audit firms it ran were super lucrative. At around point for ex antiophthalmic factorle, Fairfield pathfinder Ltd, Madoff’s hedge fund ran by Madoff Investment Services to invest in the shares in Standards & ampere; Poor’s 500. Fairf ield claimed that its share index had risen by 5.6%, while that of S&P 500 had fallen by much than 30%. Fairfield was later said to be down by 0. 06% when that of S&P 500 had fallen by virtually16%. The firm was averaging 10. 5% annually since its inception in 1990. These statistics are quite inconsequential to believe, and is one way in which Mr. Madoff managed to brook through his Ponzi scheme. (Mike, 2008) The firm’s losses accrued up to $50 jillion since it was no longer able to endure its customer demands. This is after clients requested for about $7 jillion when they had only about $250 million in the account. (Mike, 2008)Prevention of similar frauds The mo should be made more proactive. For instance, warnings much(prenominal) as those of Harry Markopoulos, a financial analyst, should have been taken seriously by the SEC since he started his revelation anchor in 1999. The hedge fund of Mr. Madoff alike didn’t register till folk 2006, which i s too late. Recommendation for enforcement of law, such as Sec. 17 (a) of the Securities Act 1933, Sec. 10 (b) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and rule 10b-5 there under, and sections 206(1&2) of the Advisors Act of 1940, forget also aid forbid such frauds.It is worth to postulate public the reality of rates of interests offered by a firm to its clients. This creates transparency and some sense of genuineness of a firm’s undertaking. The accounting professionals also should be made to learn from such cases to prevent future occurrences of the same vice. Public knowingness programs can be broadcasted through media too. This will warn investors to be careful in their choice of investments portfolio. Reference: Mike, S. (2008, December 13th). Biggest pasquinade in History $50 billion Madoff Ponzi Scheme. Retrieved April 4th, 2009, from The Market Oracle: http://www. marketoracle. co. uk/Article7769. html.\r\n'