Domestic security Essay

jurisprudence squad Global says, As an organization, the Canadian Forces (CF) is the solely procedure undetermined of providing the specific assets and professional knowledge to combat todays threats to internal guarantor. The CF is the only organization that possesses the corporate knowledge to play a working clique of such magnitude. However, throughout the essay group Global contradicts this point of view by stating the CF effectiveness could be augmented to play a more active role in domesticated security operation.Another contradiction is presented by stating, in company to facilitate these changes, several intergovernmental and interdepartmental congressships need to be developed and maintained in conjunction with noncombatant generatorities, other governments and other departments of the CF. Finally, the agent says the CF has unique assets and the government can not afford to send packing them when considering domestic security issues. Throughout the essay, the author reveals a series of contradictions sledding the reader with questions regarding domestic security whose responsibility is it? Team Global makes destination to the CF having a primary obligation to value the country and its citizens composition defending and securing Canada. In comparison with the civil government organization, how different atomic number 18 these domestic security responsibilities? The Canada Border Services style (CBSA) is committed to providing a smarter, more secure and efficient border.To achieve this goal, they add, the CBSA relies on technology, information sharing, run a risk analysis and biometrics, (Safety and Security). National Security requires an integrated approach to ensure former(a) detection and prevention of any potential threats to Canada and the public. Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), and provincial and municipal police services, The RCMP has refocused its National Security Investigations Sections (NSIS) to become Integrated National Security Enforcement Teams (INSETs).The author states that since September 11, 2001, a government analysis of terrorist threats show the only delegacy capable of both deterrence and prevention is the CF. The CF, being the only agency funds, would be aired exclusively to this organization. However, Ottawa advanced an initial investment of $7. 7 billion to support a comprehensive, multi-year, multi-department federal scheme to strengthen public safety and security by 2006 providing a contradicting materialization of funds, (Louis Osemwegie).Furthermore, the essay leans towards customs with reference to past civil security responsibilities. Team Global states, traditionally, surveillance and control of the Canadian territory, airspace and marine area, lies with civilian agencies such as the Department of Transport The threat of terrorism regarding domestic security in Canada traditionally existed after 9/11. When the author speaks of tradition and new government analysis, it misleads the actual role these organizations have played and advance to be involved with Canadiandomestic security issues. An article by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives relay that after Sept 11 attacks, the Canadian government developed the concept of Reinventing Borders. The Council explains, in order to achieve what the Canadian government has described as a border is something that is open for occupancy besides closed to terrorism. This indicates to the reader that it is clear that government civilian organization remain a component of Canadian domestic security in reference to smart border declaration and accord.Next muddiness is further focused with regards to sole responsibility of domestic security when discussing legislation, policies, report and the National vindication Act (NDA). Rules and regulation are implemented to guide, direct and set limitation with restrictions to maintain a certain order at heart society and the organization acting within. The Canadian Forces is being pointed out by the author as the sole organization capable of handling the task and responsibilities of Canadian domestic security.It is fair to question then, why do the policies, legislation, NDA and Canadian Constitution Act 1867 outline rules with respect to civil power? They reenforce a joint effort to exist between CF and civilian organizations. Again the author says, the protection of the Canadian coastline is defined through Defence policies, which encourage Maritime elements to increase surveillance of Canadian water and approaches in the cooperation with the Canadian Coast Guard, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the United States Coast Guard.Again, a contradiction is made by the author who now reflects a combine effort as an effective content. Finally, Team Global states, due to the CFs unique operational experience and assets, they are solely capable of providing both the corporat e knowledge and skills required to provide sound domestic security. With regards to the assets, team global explain that the Canadian Navy with its Frigates and Victoria class submarines are unique to domestic security capabilities. Louis ? fe ?semwegie states, in the Maritimes, it means acquiring patrol vessels to augment the Navy with added capabilities to enable interoperability with USN and US Coast Guard, instead of purchasing an expensive Destroyer or more Victoria class submarines, supposedly, other Cold War legacies. Furthermore, submarines are say to be highly effective at sinking ships and other submarines, only they are of little or no use in peacekeeping and peace building operations, or even in conducting coastal patrols to protect fisheries and catch smugglers, (Staples and Robinson).In conclusion, Team Globals view and render presents a number of contradictions throughout the essay. Which organization best fits the role of Canadian Domestic Security is not clear . Much discussion is forwarded in relation to organizations, i. e. civilian, Canadian Forces and assets accompanying both. The reader is left to make his or her ratiocination of Domestic Security and Canadas best fit solution. Canada, being a bountiful democratic society presents the voice of its citizens as a liberal democratic society. The author has educated the reader of what organizations are involved but is unclear of whom is solely responsible.