Disembodied Existence After Death Is Entirely Possible

Lauren Cole A disembodied institution after wipeout is entirely possible Discuss. Plato takes a dualist view and indeed believes that a disembodied macrocosm is entirely possible and the understanding is diaphanous from the remains. At our expiry, the spirit is set free from the body where it has been imprisoned and it is this instant able to achieve its ultimate goal and reach the world of the forms. The soul is the only immortal part of the body and braved the world of the forms beforehand it came entrapped in the body, thus when we learn we ar simply recalling what our soul knew before.Plato holds a disallow view of the body as it distracts the soul from seeking the forms with its trivial mercenary desires such as sex. If we want to be true philosophers we imply to revoke distractions and concentrate on gaining knowledge of the forms. In order to further rationalize this Plato uses the transport analogy in which the mind and body are egress of control horses a nd the soul is being driven by the in the chariot so needs to reign them in and control them.The soul outside of the body is simple and without parts in so far the soul inside the body is complex and has different aspects such as reason, spirit and desire. Peter Geach disagreed with Plato and questioned what is stooge mean for the disembodied soul to see the forms, given that seeing is a process linked to the body and the bodies senses. Plato has two main arguments to prove the existence of the soul the first is the argument from knowledge which argues that learning is simply retention what the soul has previously known in the world of the forms.We just need to remember it, and this shows that things exist before we learn them for example gravity existed before we knew it. However, many people argue that learning is not a be of remembering, but instead is a matter of acquiring new knowledge. The flake is the argument for opposites in which Plato argued that the physical world c onsists of opposites such as tolerant and small, light and dark, sleeping and waking. The opposite of living would be death, yet for death to be an actual thing and not just nothing, the soul mustiness exist.Aristotle believed that the soul in the form and shape of the body and is a nerve centre like matter be answer matter can be given a form and be many different things, but what gives matter its region is its form. By conjureing this, Aristotle means that the soul gives shape to the matter which is the body and the soul is the principle of life or activity of the body. Aristotle argued that there is a salmagundi of hierarchy of faculties in the soul and suggested that the faculties are nutrition, perception, desire, locomotion and intellect.Plants control the power of nutrition, they obtain food and this is what keeps them alive however, animals not only have this might but also other capacities such as perception and desire. The energy of intellect distinguishes humans on the hierarchy. Thus he believes that the soul is the cause and principle of the living body and therefore it cannot survive after death as the Form of the body is inseparable from the body. However, confusion has been caused as Aristotle did suggest in his writings that intellectual thought could possibly be uninvolved from the soul and be eternal.The identity speculation claims that rational activities are centred in the brain and this is supported by scientific research surrounding the qualifying of mood, character and behaviour by drugs. If drugs affect our character surely this suggests mental activity is not linked to an immortal soul or a separate identity, but to the brain. Hence, when physical life ends, mental activity ends and we bar to exist and have knowledge. This theory has been criticized by T.Davis who argues that identity theory has been concord how intentionality can be explained. Brain activity does consist of nerves operate in the brain and when you ma ke a decision you form an intention, yet neural activity has no intentionality, therefore perhaps a soul or other entity controls our intentionality. Davis also points out that mental events are mystic and have no physical location as they are rattling personal to the individual.Although Richard Dawkins was a strict atheist he believed in a disembodied existence after death for other reasons, arguing that individuals cannot survive death completely, but do continue to live through memories and genes. He points out that genes do not have any direction although they are potentially immortal as they are the basic unit of instinctive selection. For those that do not believe in religious teachings, Dawkins theory is convincing as we remember those that have died through many generations and their genes have also been passed down through their family.